It is not like you litter because there are more cleaners. Yes, there is some dependence (a feedback loop) but generally you have more cleaners because you litter more. The gov just tries to address the issue because Singaporeans generally don't want to do such work.earthfriendly wrote:Come to think of it, I actually have something to add. In order to enlarge the $economy$, they wanted more women in the work force. Starting my generation while growing up in Singapore, we were fed the idea that we, the women of Singapore, could be whatever we aspired to be. Be a good student, study, work hard and a $uccessful career would ensue and we would no longer be bounded by household duties. Unlike our poor mothers. Wow, belly nice. You mean no more $tupid household chores when I grow up
. Because the lovely govt of $ingapore will start importing foreign workers for cheap to clean up your shit for you. Hmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn, sounds like a very good idea..................daydreaming of utopia.
In SG, any Tom, Dick or Harry household can freely hire foreign domestic help. In Taiwan, the household actually need to apply thru their council to get the permission and it is usually only granted for families with elderly medical related care. Not sure about HK though.
+all of the abovex9200 wrote:Singaporeans generally don't want to do such work.
Looking at the way I was brought up the problem with the litter is double fold. Firstly, if you litter it means you are not socially apt. It is sort of like you missed your toilet training.. so other people have to take care of you and wipe youR *beep*.
In Europe, both parents working with no maid is a perfectly normal situation. Simply, schools, kindergartens and such work the way to fit the working time of the parents.
You, yourself, ordinary people, created this rather sick system by relying on the convenience of having a FDW. At least this is IMHO.
No wonder so few SGn professionals dare to venture out into the world, self-reliance and self-discipline is required.Brah wrote: It all just perpetuates the paradigm of not taking responsibility for oneself.
Sounds like SMS in the mornings and JR8 most times of the day.earthfriendly wrote: I go thru bouts of hyperactivity.
And this is what I like about you.earthfriendly wrote:I hear, I hear. Thank you all for your feedback. So many angles to consider when looking at one issue. I love this forum site. When I showed my sweetie (i.e. my hubby) my post, he noted my use of profanity. I have accordingly replaced the four letter s-word with a more appropriate term. I go thru bouts of hyperactivity and add to that, a caffeine overload that day
.
nakatago wrote:Sounds like SMS in the mornings and JR8 most times of the day.earthfriendly wrote: I go thru bouts of hyperactivity.
http://fortune.com/2015/01/22/larry-sum ... -qe-davos/“It’s like standing up in an audience,” said Summers. “If you do it, you can see better. But if everyone does it at the same time, no one is better off.”
Are you saying only men should work?Wd40 wrote:I think the "both parents working" is more of bane than a boon. I think its a privilege to be a stay at home mom and get to spend more time with kids rather than work for an a$$hole and take all the $hit in office. If only one member of the family works in majority of the families then the whole economy adjusts such that salary for 1 person is sufficient to run the family. But now what we have in Singapore with both members working, is salaries have got depressed and now the economy has got adjusted, especially house prices, such that both members have to work to bring in enough income to sustain the increased cost of living.
Larry Summers made this excellent analogy which perfectly fits this scenario:http://fortune.com/2015/01/22/larry-sum ... -qe-davos/“It’s like standing up in an audience,” said Summers. “If you do it, you can see better. But if everyone does it at the same time, no one is better off.”
If the woman is career minded then its okay to work, but when I see the expression of faces in day to day life, I dont really see them as too much happy. Poor SG'reans trapped in their false sense of prosperity.
Barnsley wrote:Are you saying only men should work?Wd40 wrote:I think the "both parents working" is more of bane than a boon. I think its a privilege to be a stay at home mom and get to spend more time with kids rather than work for an a$$hole and take all the $hit in office. If only one member of the family works in majority of the families then the whole economy adjusts such that salary for 1 person is sufficient to run the family. But now what we have in Singapore with both members working, is salaries have got depressed and now the economy has got adjusted, especially house prices, such that both members have to work to bring in enough income to sustain the increased cost of living.
Larry Summers made this excellent analogy which perfectly fits this scenario:http://fortune.com/2015/01/22/larry-sum ... -qe-davos/“It’s like standing up in an audience,” said Summers. “If you do it, you can see better. But if everyone does it at the same time, no one is better off.”
If the woman is career minded then its okay to work, but when I see the expression of faces in day to day life, I dont really see them as too much happy. Poor SG'reans trapped in their false sense of prosperity.
Whats up with a stay at home dad if the mum is bringing home the bacon?
Are you in the 1950's?
I missed this one at the time.bgd wrote:East Coast Park on a Monday morning is a fine example of how clean Sg really is. Looks better by lunch time though.![]()
Years back there was a pro-fox hunting rally in Hyde Park, London. Basically the country came to the city for a day or so. After the crowds left, Hyde Park was cleaner than when they arrived. Now that is something to aspire to.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests