ecureilx wrote:LOL, take advantage of vulnerable ? that's a pretty normal day in SG .. in most cases .. or instead of receiving counseling I have seen a few start dishing out their own version of counseling ..
Lol ...

If such a group is moderated, the moderator should spot that a mile off, and if it’s ‘unhealthy’ put an end to it. You’re dealing with a group of hurt and at that point in time vulnerable people, the last thing you need is more s*** being piled on...
ecureilx wrote:Long long time ago, I had a gf like that .. amazingly I never realised it was her form of psychological warfare and did achieve in her objective of making me guilty for her actions and making my life miserable.. till I woke up one day !! You learn and make sure you dont repeat the mistakes, is my life lesson !!
I’d go as far as to suggest most people know or have known someone with a personality disorder. It’s curious that we never get taught a basic overview on them in school; it would surely empower people for later life. Instead there seems to be much more emphasis on knowledge of more tangible matters rather than ‘Know Thyself’ (one of the ancient Greece philosopher Plato’s maxims). Thus it is usual to leave school and be released into the world, an innocent.
I think there is also an element of gender-expectations within it. Girls seem to spend much time considering the micro-details of inter-personal relationships. Boys on the other hand are taught to ‘just get on with things’ and not bother with moods/reasons, the reasons people do things matters much less, and consideration of it is ‘girlie, and unmanly or 'gay'’. Also there is a significant culture (well, in ‘the West’) not to stigmatise people by putting a lable on their behaviour. So rather than having a diagnosable personality disorder, their behaviour, even at the extremes of the scale, is explained as [say] ‘unpredicable mood swings’, or ‘thrill seeking’, or ‘self-destructive’, or ‘incredibly vain’, or ‘attention seeking’, and so on. Most people aren’t taught about PDs, and certainly most men are positively disinterested about learning about them (at least until they find themselves one day having to). ‘What do I care, I can spot a mental person a mile off!?’. Yes but if there are ‘50 shades of grey, there are 1,000 shades of personality’, and being able to reasonably identify the more toxic end of the scales* is going to simplify later life, and potentially save you a whole heap of s***.
Many of us will have heard of ADHD (Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder), and Shizophrenia (‘schizoaffective disorder’), but that’s likely because the big drugs companies have an interest in selling products to control it. Certainly in the case of ADHD, and it’s treatment with Ritalin*1 manufactured by Novartis, the latter have a direct interest in as many people as possible being diagnosed with ADHD. When this conjoins with parents of naturally boisterous teenagers, who really just wish their children would ‘give them a break some days!’, the ready market is set and made. Suddenly many parents have a useful way to explain their tyrant children’s behaviour; ‘Oh he’s got ADHD, the doctor prescribed him Ritalin for it’, is simpler and more socially acceptable than explaining ‘Yes he’s a little monster, that’s because we’re so tired at the end of a workday we can’t be bothered trying to control him (i.e. poor parenting skills)’.
In some ways the taboo of this field reminds me of the matter of the generally little understood field of body language. Not that it’s taboo, it’s just not taught unless you study psychology or human behaviour. I imagine we can all spot a fake smile, or the significance of if we are talking to someone, during which they cross their arms, and shift their gaze from your face, towards some distant point (feigning disinterest, as part of social negotiation or power-play). Or, when someone is chatting, and then they move their hand to their face, often their chin or lower lip, or nose (an indicator of not telling the entire truth). How about, you go to say a drinks reception, or party, and you are introduced to someone new. For a starter the feet will position themselves, towards you and open at say ninety degrees (a sign of interest) bodes well, at least for starters. The opening discussion is often quite ego-driven, in that you have to discover not only what to chat about of mutual interest, but also on what level to relate to that person. There is a social pecking order, and social hierarchy, and further conversation needs to rapidly determine the relative position of both. Hence the most common opening question beyond exchanging names is ‘And what do you do?’. Bang, having processed that, you can now with reasonable certainty begin pigeon-holing a person. What follows then often is a form of role-play. The banking-IT intern will defer hugely to the director of a bank, even if they are the same age, as is expected of their relative status. The non-working wife of a middling FT is likely not going to make friends (in her own right) with a female director of an airline or software company (etc); often simply verbalised as ‘We’ve little/nothing in common’.
This matter of ego and ‘social position’ leads on to the visual displays of it, the public signalling of it. The Hermes tie, the gold Rolex, the Gucci handbag, the Prada heels (most of these products usefully come with their own unmissible status-transmitter, i.e. a bloody great brand logo on the front for all to see): And yes hence the allure of counterfeit luxury goods, desire or ownership of which is surely seeking to try and convey a social status that you do not have.
Anyway enough, 3 espressos and I’m fully wired...
*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSM-5
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_disorder
*1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylphenidate