Still 40% or so of Singapore land is forest cover ... just saying ..calugaruvaxile wrote: nowadays, all sg looks like central hk as it's seen from the peak.
And Singapore has "grown" by nearly 12% since independence due to reclamation ...
Still 40% or so of Singapore land is forest cover ... just saying ..calugaruvaxile wrote: nowadays, all sg looks like central hk as it's seen from the peak.
Given that major economies are projecting a gradual move towards growth starting to kick in in within the year, with parallel rises in interest rates, this would seem to be precisely the wrong time for TDSR to be relaxed. I.e. the cost of servicing debt is likely already on a gradual long-term upward path.Primrose Hill wrote:with the election coming, do you think that the govt may react favourably given that the TDSR and the ABSD is having a negative effect on the housing prices?
Valid points ....calugaruvaxile wrote:the rents won't go up either way. simply there is not enough demand. the businesses consider Sg already too expensive. push prices up now = kill the golden goose ...Primrose Hill wrote:with the election coming, do you think that the govt may react favourably given that the TDSR and the ABSD is having a negative effect on the housing prices?
asking prices go up? great but ... who's gonna pay for that? the interest rates are climbing (no more free money!) and with rents not moving up, the high prices are simply too much. oh, that's part of the reason why transactions are stalled even nowadays. yes, the official statement is that "people expect further drops", but truth is, sg incomes are already low compared to the costs of living (which are really high!!).
quite honestly, i have no idea how to get out of this squeezy situation softly; but on the other hand, maybe they deserve it for their aggressive milking during the "good days". i call this "indirect tax on doing business in sg":).
That's what I am trying to do but my LL, despite of being really a reasonable person, for some reason* thinks his apartment is special, worth higher price and apparently resistant to the market changes (at least those not in his favor). I already told him that unless he is very lucky there is now way he will manage to find a new tenant for the price valid 2y ago in any reasonable time. For ~25 units available in that condo, ~20 is offered 10% or more below the price and only 2-3 units at higher, all negotiable of course. I even offered him help to get rid of his agent so actually he would de facto maintain (roughly) the price but so far it looks he may need to learn the lesson hard way. Unfortunately also at our cost and huge inconvenience.the lynx wrote:Still going down. Been having intense discussions with friends who are renewing this year. Renter's market. The decline of expats is forcing landlords to face either empty units with mortgage piling up, or reduce rent and keep current tenants. So if you like your current place, try to seek reduction. Because chances are that you will always be able to find cheaper and batter places, or your landlord will be looking at empty unit or high-risk tenant.
I dont think the Agents help .... surely they too are in the same boat though , some rental agreement is better than no agreement. I really dont get the logic?x9200 wrote:Except he is an Indian and I am asking only for a fair adjustment, not to get it as low as possible. I can rent a same size unit in this condo $500 below what I pay now and I only ask half of this. Funny enough I had the impression that he actually expected a rise.
It is an interesting phenomena how a person otherwise very reasonable suddenly gets resistant to any common sense based argument.
Not sure. I recon if a REA is big enough (many flats under) he may want to wait a month or three to get this additional $300. But in any longer time, yes, it would appear better to have more frequent contracts signed rather than wait with nothing in hand.Barnsley wrote:I dont think the Agents help .... surely they too are in the same boat though , some rental agreement is better than no agreement. I really dont get the logic?
I don't expect him to cause any trouble by himself. He is an easy going person and he is not greedy. This is not a kiasu-like thing neither. I think his financial situation might have changed some time after he rented it out to us and he made some wrong assumptions (probably) partly for the reason we met together also socially.Wd40 wrote:I know its a tricky situation to deal with this kind of landlord. What about your deposit? This landlord could make it difficult for you to get back your deposit. But knowing you and your legal expertise, I know you will make it equally hard for him as well.
Yup, Russel PetersWd40 wrote:There is a joke about why Chinese and Indians cannot do business together. Chinese want to extract every penny possible out of you where as Indians don't want to spend a single penny.
I think this is exactly what is at play here
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests