
You relax! I am not saying racistrajagainstthemachine wrote:The nut cartoon was not racist by any stretch of the imagination, relax wd40
You most certainly did. Read your title of the thread.Wd40 wrote:You relax! I am not saying racistrajagainstthemachine wrote:The nut cartoon was not racist by any stretch of the imagination, relax wd40
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/in ... ssion.html
+1nakatago wrote:I used to do editorial cartoons. Stereotypical? Yes. Racist. No.
Editorial cartoons and caricature sketches rely on highlighting a certain, overriding characteristic to depict a subject. These characteristics are often innocent stereotypes: rich people in tuxedos, the US as Uncle Sam. In this particular case, India was depicted as cattle farmer (oooh, India, rural economy, loves cows). Personally, I'd rather draw this than a yogi...or draw a female. An Indian in a sari would be easier to depict India but I'm sure someone will still get offended if the artist isn't Indian (and by extension, by my comment as well).x9200 wrote:Am I the only one who see the NYT cartoon as in fact anti-racists and anti-stereotypical? IMHO It's a satire confronting the Western view of India and Western sense of self-superiority.nakatago wrote:I used to do editorial cartoons. Stereotypical? Yes. Racist. No.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests