JR8 wrote:Quite, it's politics.
The UK (as a whole) popularly hates banks and especially bankers (politics of envy). Despite it probably being our most profitable industry, that pays vast taxes, and really excels within a global context.
If Labour win the upcoming election (May 9th?), it's almost obligatory for them to start re-roasting the 'cash-cow banks'. Hence in reply, HSBC highlighting their supposed mobility makes corporate sense.
[I used to own shares in HSBC, and they're a solid performer. But I grew very tired of the impact of such petty politics upon their share price. You're almost better off with say a 'politically correct/benign' manufacturer of soap; Unilever, though it's yield is nothing of note].
This will keep tax friendly jurisdictions like Hong Kong and Singapore hot forever

The other day there was an article about how Australian companies like BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto use Singapore as a "front" to save tax
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/ ... IP20150407
Singapore, despite having few natural resources of its own, has been able to use a tax-incentive programme, combined with its strong financial sector, high standard of living and its large port, to attract dozens of commodity companies to set up on the tiny island.
While Singapore's headline corporate tax rate is 17 percent, some companies can take advantage of its Global Trader Programme giving them concessionary rates as low as 5 percent if they meet certain conditions, such as conducting a high volume of business in Singapore and using local banking services.
Larger companies can enjoy even lower tax rates through closed-door negotiations with the government. Most of the world's largest mining and oil companies, including BHP, Glencore Plc and BP Plc operate large businesses there.