Perhaps he'll go for a cushy job as an MEP next, and be despatched by Berlin to go and terrorise the poor Greeks [/irony]Addadude wrote: Better get used to the idea of the bearded one being at the very least Tánaiste (Deputy PM) of Ireland.
Perhaps he'll go for a cushy job as an MEP next, and be despatched by Berlin to go and terrorise the poor Greeks [/irony]Addadude wrote: Better get used to the idea of the bearded one being at the very least Tánaiste (Deputy PM) of Ireland.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said on Wednesday (Jan 28) it will adjust its monetary policy and let the Singapore dollar appreciate at a slower pace.
The revision in monetary policy came as a surprise as MAS was only scheduled to release its next monetary policy statement in April. MAS last made an "off-cycle" adjustment to policy in October 2001, in the aftermath of the Sep 11 attacks in the United States. At that time, MAS issued policy statements in January and July.
The Singapore dollar fell on the news, losing close to 1 per cent against the US dollar and by around 0.5 per cent against the euro. Around 11.30am, the US dollar was trading around S$1.3521, while the euro was worth S$1.5328, according to Bloomberg data
Since I dont read local news I missed this yesterday. I got to know about it only now from this article:"While Singapore has brought its exchange rate policy closer to the generalised monetary easing seen in many countries globally, it still has a modest appreciation policy," DBS said in a commentary.
As such, the US dollar is expected to rise at a slower pace against the Singapore vis-a-vis the currencies of most other countries, it said.
United Overseas Bank said that in view of the lowered Singapore dollar NEER slope, the US-Singapore dollar could trade towards the 1.40-level over the next six months.
The one thing in the article that makes no sense to me is the "backdrop of potential US interest rate rises". Why on earth would the US want to raise interest rates?Wd40 wrote:Today is the Aussie's turn to fall
http://www.smh.com.au/business/markets/ ... 31lcv.html
Here is the article about Poles borrowing in CHF:JR8 wrote: 'Poland and Hungary'. I haven't read the news recently about this whole saga so am unaware what their particular woes are, though I do understand that Hungary ties itself quite closely to the Swiss economy. But that's the risk, tying yourself to something over which you have no control. [X-ref S$, but at least in SGs case it's peg is against a wide enough basket of other currencies based upon physical trade, rather than being something essentially completely artificial].
The Szczukiewicz family is among 575,000 Polish households with franc mortgages, or almost half of all home loans. About 30 percent of them are now underwater, said Mieczyslaw Groszek, deputy head of the Polish Banks Association. These borrowers are stuck -- unable to buy another property -- because of the losses they would suffer, adding to the woes of a housing market in Poland that’s depended mainly on Polish cash buyers.
No worry. This is probably the only thing they will suffer from (not able to sell their properties for some time). Most of them were not going to do it anyway as this was not for a speculative property market but to address their own needs. Also this dramatic property (loan) "revaluation" is mostly for the loans taken in (IIRC) ~2007-2008 where the prices of the properties were peak-high.Wd40 wrote:Here is the article about Poles borrowing in CHF:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... ing-market
The Szczukiewicz family is among 575,000 Polish households with franc mortgages, or almost half of all home loans. About 30 percent of them are now underwater, said Mieczyslaw Groszek, deputy head of the Polish Banks Association. These borrowers are stuck -- unable to buy another property -- because of the losses they would suffer, adding to the woes of a housing market in Poland that’s depended mainly on Polish cash buyers.
The Central Bank has informed about the risk but they probably have seen no reasons to intervene and rightly so (IMHO). As I said earlier, I don't think it is really a disaster of any kind.JR8 wrote:Wow, half of Poland's outstanding mortgages are in Swiss Francs [and the central bank never considered this was risky?]![]()
Maybe the property market functions more like the German one, where a family buys a property and lives there for life, and then it's passed to the next generation (who already live there too)... The place I lived, there were several neighbours who had been born in their current units, and pre-war too (pre 1939). A very alien concept to me, but it was fascinating to occasionally get to hear their stories of times back then.
In contrast the Anglo-Saxon model seems to be more of buy, trade-up, extend/remodel, trade up... and on and on, etc. End in as big/good enough place as you can. Then when your housing needs reduce, maybe when children move out and get their own places, then you are sitting on a valuable asset that represents a big chunk of a lot of people's accumulated wealth.
Hmm I see, thanks.x9200 wrote: For the property holding habits It is roughly like you mentioned for Germany (but not any longer about few generations living under one roof). Also, only recently (1 generation) the job market became more mobile. Traditionally, people are looking for a job where they currently live rather than in another city. Selling or renting out the property and moving out to a different city for a job is relatively uncommon.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest