QRM wrote:And that's their other mind boggling argument that SG is not in the west so why should it conform the western ideas of how a society should behave, with comments like the colonial days are over etc.
You often see videos of road accident in an Asian environment where witnesses would just stand there or totally ignore the victim, is it because their local logic thinks in this world nothing happens to a person that he does not for some reason or other deserve. .... man cannot interfere with its inexorable results.
Maybe they'd like to try and behave as collaboratively as say the JPnese do? Nah. What you have is what Thatcher was often misquoted as saying about the UK 'There is no such thing as society [just a collection of individuals each pursuing his own ends]'. Just here it's in a nakedly anarcho- phase with the baser instincts to the fore.
Tricky isn't it. One suspects SG wouldn't have it's riches if people weren't like this, so I suppose it's a case of continually trying to cajole and whip these baser instincts to be inside 'internationally acceptable limits' of behaviour.
It's works for most, but a group is defined and remembered not by the majority, but by the actions of the few on it's periphery.
Lack of individual initiative, you could argue that's a facet of much of Asian society. In place of initiative, they need hierarchy and for orders to be issued.