Open to adults only. 13 years and above.rajagainstthemachine wrote:yoga is free in the ramakrishna ashram like it always should be
http://ramakrishna.org.sg/rkmsg/index.p ... ties/yoga/
wonder why the mission is limiting it to adultssundaymorningstaple wrote:Open to adults only. 13 years and above.rajagainstthemachine wrote:yoga is free in the ramakrishna ashram like it always should be
http://ramakrishna.org.sg/rkmsg/index.p ... ties/yoga/
x9200 wrote:1. DP allows to work. She needs to find a job and apply for letter of consent (LoC).
2. Cleaning a yoga studio and being paid for this in-kind is a job like any other so she would need a work permit to do this. If she just do the job receiving nothing tangible in exchange she still needs a permit (another LoC).
That's a rather all encompassing interpretation of work permit requirements. What would the company file on an IR8A for this in kind employee? How would the company record this "expense" on their books when no money has been expended?x9200 wrote:1. DP allows to work. She needs to find a job and apply for letter of consent (LoC).
2. Cleaning a yoga studio and being paid for this in-kind is a job like any other so she would need a work permit to do this. If she just do the job receiving nothing tangible in exchange she still needs a permit (another LoC).
IRAS has everything to do with it "at this stage". If the person is not taking potential economic benefit from a Singaporean, then where is the need for a work permit?x9200 wrote:Why to consider what form the company has to file for the tax purposes if she does not have any work permit? It is irrelevant. Whatever is the view of the value exchange handle we may want to consider she would need a permit to do this job. Formally at least. This where MOM may get its focus. IRAS has nothing to do with it at this stage.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest