Alternatively, you may have the better educated and working votes that would quite often be too busy to make it to the polls. My assumption is undereducated and underemployed. people would have plenty of time to vote. That's how it usually works in the US.Steve1960 wrote:So all over the news this morning is the excitement about a record turnout for this kind of event possibly over 90%.
Is that a good thing? It suggests there is potentially a high proportion of lesser educated people voting without understanding the implications of their decision. A much bigger proportion of economic and political ignorance than for any general election?
Could one of the most important decisions in the history of the United Kingdom actually be swayed by people who had very little understanding of the issue?
Possibly but not typical in the UK. At the 2010 General Election the highest percentage of voters were in the higher social classes, home owners and in the 55 ish age bracket and the lowest social classes had the smallest turnout.zzm9980 wrote: Alternatively, you may have the better educated and working votes that would quite often be too busy to make it to the polls. My assumption is undereducated and underemployed. people would have plenty of time to vote. That's how it usually works in the US.
Consider yourself lucky thenSteve1960 wrote:Possibly but not typical in the UK. At the 2010 General Election the highest percentage of voters were in the higher social classes, home owners and in the 55 ish age bracket and the lowest social classes had the smallest turnout.zzm9980 wrote: Alternatively, you may have the better educated and working votes that would quite often be too busy to make it to the polls. My assumption is undereducated and underemployed. people would have plenty of time to vote. That's how it usually works in the US.
Dya wreckon tha mun than neemed thart counteh war peeshed oower jerst huvvin a laerff?Steve1960 wrote:Clackmannanshire results have been declared.
I'm of the school of 'If it ain't broke don't fix it', tempered with 'But if you insist on doing so, then you deserve the result that you invite'.Mexikaner wrote:JR8, it seems to me, after reading some of your comments here, that you wouldn't mind Scotland getting its independence.
It makes me wonder how would a different referendum result in which English/Welsh/N.Irish were asked whether 'Yes' or 'No' to keep Scotland as part of UK...
'Estados Unidos Mexicanos' or 'United Mexican States' is just the official name of the country. 'Mexico' is just the common name, just like 'America' to the official 'United States of America'.JR8 wrote: p.s. Edit to add: I was interested to see that the coin in your avatar is inscribed with [translated]: United States of Mexico. I've never heard of it referred to it in that way before. Until when were they disunited?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests