zzm9980 wrote: i no rite ?! he cud hav gon 2 wikipeedia and red wat e vikings posted lulz

zzm9980 wrote:i no rite ?! he cud hav gon 2 wikipeedia and red wat e vikings posted lulzproxymoron wrote:Sounds strange to me. So what did the Christopher Colombus really do? He could have got all the info from Vikings.JR8 wrote: An American Indian woman may have been the first native American to set foot on European soil, brought to Iceland by the Vikings
^^ This is being a really intelligent argument right there, I would request you elaborate on that why it is foolish.JR8 wrote:JR8 wrote: Where is the culture of Australopithecus?A foolish statementproxymoron wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Andamanese_people
Those (or similar ones) are still out there my friend.
I must say that this argument sounds better than your previous one. Once again I will have to ask to you tell me what you believe is 'factually right' about South America. Is it still the land of Incas and Aztec people? And the list of Spanish origin names showing up in list of famous South Americans are just a minority?JR8 wrote: It is self-evident that you have not been, as if you had you would be unlikely to claim that which you are. Your statements rely upon being 'pretty sure', but that's not enough to be factually correct.
Arent Ukranians and Russians different ethnic groups?, there is a war going on right now just for this reason. And I would say that the pragmatic reason was racism. Can you see any other pragmatic reason for slavery?.x9200 wrote:Ukrainians were targeted because of the reasons of nationalism (as seen by the Soviet Union). So the reason was to wipe out the nation that was not happy under the Soviet ruling and may interfere with it. If this was a different SU nation with different ethnic groups this genocide might have happened too.
Holocaust had no pragmatic reasons. It happened just because the Nazis believed the Jews were the race that competed directly with the Aryan uber race. It was pure race based extermination.
You suggested the inhabitants of the Andaman Islands are Australopithecus, rather than Homo sapians (in their modern form). It makes as little sense as suggesting Australian aborigines are in fact Neanderthals.proxymoron wrote:^^ This is being a really intelligent argument right there, I would request you elaborate on that why it is foolish.
JR8 wrote: It is self-evident that you have not been, as if you had you would be unlikely to claim that which you are. Your statements rely upon being 'pretty sure', but that's not enough to be factually correct.
proxymoron wrote:I must say that this argument sounds better than your previous one. Once again I will have to ask to you tell me what you believe is 'factually right' about South America. Is it still the land of Incas and Aztec people?
Haven't a clue, and it's off-topic.proxymoron wrote:Let me add Philippines also to the argument. I have been there many times, so this is not about being pretty sure about it. Any cultural traits and practices before colonization were totally destroyed. Would you claim that too is factually incorrect?
We are of two different races so for any conflict situation it simply can not be any other reason but the racism. Right. BTW, do you have a maid?proxymoron wrote:Arent Ukranians and Russians different ethnic groups?, there is a war going on right now just for this reason. And I would say that the pragmatic reason was racism. Can you see any other pragmatic reason for slavery?.x9200 wrote:Ukrainians were targeted because of the reasons of nationalism (as seen by the Soviet Union). So the reason was to wipe out the nation that was not happy under the Soviet ruling and may interfere with it. If this was a different SU nation with different ethnic groups this genocide might have happened too.
Holocaust had no pragmatic reasons. It happened just because the Nazis believed the Jews were the race that competed directly with the Aryan uber race. It was pure race based extermination.
How about you read what Wikipedia has to say about the Holocaust?proxymoron wrote:Holocaust happened during the wartime in a certain Germany which was forced to pay for the damages. Cant it also be like the Ukranians, that Jews were targeted because they might interfere with the nationalism of ethnic germans?
Philippines ?proxymoron wrote: But I will have argue against showing up Jews as the only victim. May be it is 'sociological phenomena' said earlier by x9200. For me, Jews were not the only ones whose culture was wiped out. Whole South America had their culture wiped out by European conquistadors. Same happened here closer to home, to Philippines.?
x9200 wrote: We are of two different races so for any conflict situation it simply can not be any other reason but the racism. Right. BTW, do you have a maid?
x9200 wrote: How about you read what Wikipedia has to say about the Holocaust?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
I have bee there a number of times, also have many Filipino friends. My wife and daughter are Filipinos, which makes me visit there at least time and again.ecureilx wrote:
Philippines ?
really ?
mmm, you dont know much about Philippines, Filipino culture and stuff
they have more Chinese influence, apart from native cultural practices most of which is intact, and little of any of their colonial master's influence, if you meant driving American cars, or being hooked to Western Music, or dressing American or strongly following basket ball.
Philippines economy may have gone to dogs because of the colonial masters, and their subsequent interferences, but sir, they culture was little destroyed
and if you believe the church and all have destroyed their culture, I suggest you venture a bit out of the cities and go visit some rural places ...proxymoron wrote:I have bee there a number of times, also have many Filipino friends. My wife and daughter are Filipinos, which makes me visit there at least time and again.
There was a pre-hispanic Philippines rich with beliefs and traditions. The current nation rub Bishops is a far cry from that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_mythology
The irony is you aren't German, and even if you are a fan of their football team, if you attended a match there they'd very likely scalp you alive...proxymoron wrote:JR8 wrote:You're Indian FFS, what is your problem with Jews?![]()
![]()
I am a German football fan
Spanish names.ecureilx wrote:Philippines ?proxymoron wrote: But I will have argue against showing up Jews as the only victim. May be it is 'sociological phenomena' said earlier by x9200. For me, Jews were not the only ones whose culture was wiped out. Whole South America had their culture wiped out by European conquistadors. Same happened here closer to home, to Philippines.?
really ?
mmm, you dont know much about Philippines, Filipino culture and stuff
they have more Chinese influence, apart from native cultural practices most of which is intact, and little of any of their colonial master's influence, if you meant driving American cars, or being hooked to Western Music, or dressing American or strongly following basket ball.
Philippines economy may have gone to dogs because of the colonial masters, and their subsequent interferences, but sir, they culture was little destroyed
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests