FBAR for 2013

Discuss about the latest news & interesting topics, real life experience or other out of topic discussions with locals & expatriates in Singapore.
Post Reply
User avatar
maneo
Reporter
Reporter
Posts: 751
Joined: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 2:46 pm
Location: Tropical cosmopolitan island

FBAR for 2013

Post by maneo » Thu, 26 Jun 2014 1:47 pm

For those that must file (i.e. certain "US persons"), what do you think of the new, online FinCEN 114 BSA e-filing system that's replaced the old, paper-based TDF 90-22.1 forms?

http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Bus ... ounts-FBAR

No paper is needed now & the expansion function for adding pages is certainly more convenient than creating continuation pages for the fill-able pdf version of IRS Form 8938.

By the way, this link gives a comparison between the FBAR & From 8938:

http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Compariso ... quirements

Also found out from IRS FinCEN that foreign retirement accounts, such as CPF, should be included, even though they are SG's version of Social Security. The stated basis for this is that the CPF accounts are separate and "are held in the individual's name" rather than being pooled as in defined benefit programs. Hmmm.
Was told to electronically file amended FBARs for the past 6 years (i.e. length of statute of limitations).
Joy.

At least have got another year deferral on accounts one has signature authority in but no financial interest, so don't need to include the condo management committee account this year.

Only a few more days left to submit.
:roll:

User avatar
sundaymorningstaple
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39633
Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
Answers: 10
Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot

Post by sundaymorningstaple » Thu, 26 Jun 2014 3:09 pm

Yeah, I had to do the same only I had to go back 7 yrs to 2007 because of the CPF. Was given wrong info years ago (actually for many years there was no determination on it, but a couple of years ago, they changed it, but I missed it. :(

I thought there was a 7 year statute of limitations, not 6. :?
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers

User avatar
maneo
Reporter
Reporter
Posts: 751
Joined: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 2:46 pm
Location: Tropical cosmopolitan island

Post by maneo » Thu, 26 Jun 2014 3:24 pm

According to the IRS, for civil penalties it's 6 years:

"4.26.17.5.5 (05-05-2008)
FBAR Statute of Limitations


1. Title 26 statutes of limitations do not apply to FBAR cases.

2. The statute of limitations on assessment of civil FBAR penalties is six years from the date of the violation.

. . .

4. The statute of limitations on FBAR criminal penalties is five years from the date the offense is committed."

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-026-017.html

User avatar
taxico
Director
Director
Posts: 3232
Joined: Sat, 10 May 2008 6:05 pm
Location: Existential dilemma!

Post by taxico » Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:51 am

"get your billion back, america!"
Aut viam ad caelum inveniam aut faciam

User avatar
sundaymorningstaple
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 39633
Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
Answers: 10
Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot

Post by sundaymorningstaple » Sat, 28 Jun 2014 7:00 am

maneo wrote:According to the IRS, for civil penalties it's 6 years:

"4.26.17.5.5 (05-05-2008)
FBAR Statute of Limitations


1. Title 26 statutes of limitations do not apply to FBAR cases.

2. The statute of limitations on assessment of civil FBAR penalties is six years from the date of the violation.

. . .

4. The statute of limitations on FBAR criminal penalties is five years from the date the offense is committed."

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part4/irm_04-026-017.html
Guess I'm just too honest. :?
SOME PEOPLE TRY TO TURN BACK THEIR ODOMETERS. NOT ME. I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHY I LOOK THIS WAY. I'VE TRAVELED A LONG WAY, AND SOME OF THE ROADS WEREN'T PAVED. ~ Will Rogers

User avatar
maneo
Reporter
Reporter
Posts: 751
Joined: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 2:46 pm
Location: Tropical cosmopolitan island

Post by maneo » Mon, 30 Jun 2014 8:46 am

It looks like going back to 2007 was just right.
The submission for year 2007 should have been by end Jun 2008, exactly 6 years ago today.

Having to correct for CPF, etc. may seem pointless for those of us that are "too honest," but it's best not to give the bureaucratic enforcement vultures any excuse to boost their "penalties levied" KPI at our expense.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests