I think this is the modern job market, both employers and employees are more fleetfooted and short-term thinking. As per the earlier linkedin article and comments about employers keeping their options open, and still pursuing other candidates despite being keen on someone. I agree it is a turn off, but then surely the same is true of many job-seekers, who will continue looking for something better even as they sign the contract and in the first months of a new job. It's not like it used to be where people have a job-for life and only change jobs on average 3-5 times in their entire career !ecureilx wrote:then again, from my experience, when unemployed and you ask the same pay as last drawn, most recruitment consultants go ... 'being unemployed you should lower your expectations ... and be ready for a cut in lieu of being unemployed .... 'JR8 wrote:I think people hiring are suspicious of applicants willing to take a pay cut. 'Are they desperate to stay on here? Will they quit the moment they get something scarcer, but more to their experience and pay level?'... and so on.
and then the consultants may be asked by the employer why the candidate is willing to work for lower pay ... which the consultant will not tell the candidate as a possible reason for rejection .....
though in SME environment, in two interviews, I was offered a basic of about 50% of my last drawn, and the bosses insisted the offers were best in view of my predicament .... no qualms there on screwing a desperate guy ....
The killer to me seems to be the slow pace that employers move here. It really squeezes unemployed candidates, as compared to their employed competitor candidates who can play it much more calmly as they continue to draw a paycheck while searching. It's like the property market too. So many sellers just "testing the market", but very few "serious" or "motivated" sellers who actually need to transact and prepared to consider market reality.