I don't know whether I would be able entitled to get a dependents' pass for my partner if we were to get married as I already have my Employment Pass.sundaymorningstaple wrote: Marriage is an option though.
They were allowing girlfriends and boyfriends of expats in on the same pass as spouses of SC. The pass for spouse of expat is superior to that for spouse of SC. If it happened in our country there'd be an uproar as well.sundaymorningstaple wrote:It was just a matter of time before the loophole was slammed shut. They don't allow common law marriages for Citizens so they were in an uproar.
If not being married is more important than seeing your partner every day, then that's the choice that party made. Those people can suck it up and follow Singapore's rules in order to be with the person they love or they can be apart. I don't get some of these posts about it being not romantic. What's not romantic would be realizing your intended doesn't love you enough to marry you when that's the only option for being together.p.s. 'Marriage is an option', for some people. But for some others that have chosen not to become married, then doing so for a visa is not desirable. Others have chosen not to be married, and won't do so under any circumstances.
If you are applying for jobs that pay below or on the cusp of the requirement for EP, then yes, having that DP will make it infinitely easier for you to get a job. I speak from experience as I've been offered several jobs and had the offer revoked once they realized spouse of citizen doesn't qualify for LOC as spouse of expat does.But does anyone know if having a DP (if we were to get married) will help make me more attractive to a company? Obviously they won't then have to sponsor my visa as a DP entitles you to work but I have been told that visa sponsorship is a negligible amount and shouldn't put a company off employing you.
That's a great idea, I've not heard of them before, but it has to be worth a go, so I will contact them. Let me know how you get on too.nic152 wrote:It may also be worth looking on the Contact Singapore website.
IanE wrote:I don't know whether I would be able entitled to get a dependents' pass for my partner if we were to get married as I already have my Employment Pass.sundaymorningstaple wrote: Marriage is an option though.
An important difference is that common law marriage is not a recognised relationship in Singapore, i,e, for SGns. Same same with same sex marriage, and so on.triste wrote:They were allowing girlfriends and boyfriends of expats in on the same pass as spouses of SC. The pass for spouse of expat is superior to that for spouse of SC. If it happened in our country there'd be an uproar as well.sundaymorningstaple wrote:It was just a matter of time before the loophole was slammed shut. They don't allow common law marriages for Citizens so they were in an uproar.
That's because those who are in EP or other work pass, are not meant to stay long-term. So they can come with their "unconventional" partners and they are welcomed to leave with them once Singapore is done with them. They are welcomed as long as this is what it takes for the talent to build up in Singapore, and once it is done and milked, off they go.triste wrote:They were allowing girlfriends and boyfriends of expats in on the same pass as spouses of SC. The pass for spouse of expat is superior to that for spouse of SC. If it happened in our country there'd be an uproar as well.sundaymorningstaple wrote:It was just a matter of time before the loophole was slammed shut. They don't allow common law marriages for Citizens so they were in an uproar.
sometime ago someone ranted that Singapore is being unfair and is breaking up his relationship ... now that was nicetriste wrote:]
If not being married is more important than seeing your partner every day, then that's the choice that party made. Those people can suck it up and follow Singapore's rules in order to be with the person they love or they can be apart. I don't get some of these posts about it being not romantic. What's not romantic would be realizing your intended doesn't love you enough to marry you when that's the only option for being together.
Isn't there some politician with a transexual child, and one (or more?) homosexual others too? Who knows. Maybe the policy is despite, or, because of that.ecureilx wrote:Lynx. you are on the right track, re: standard family unit as per specifications if SG Inc ...
'I encounter last night ah?' Been a while and I had to laugh. Some young guy with a (presumably fake) Chanel handbag strapped across his body.*the lynx wrote:My pet peeve. The only exception is when she is trying to tie her hair or shoe laces.JR8 wrote:Christ, not one guy was carrying his wife or girlfriend's handbag... amazing! lol...
Especially when he is holding for her THE WHOLE TIME! Really not attractive (both of them).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests