And that fuel vaporises and doesn't turn up as a slick.rajagainstthemachine wrote:A flight steward friend I was chatting with mentioned that pilots resort to offloading jet fuel when attempting to crash land to reduce explosion impact. With over 40 ships and aircraft from different countries on the search mission I think by the end of today we should have some answers today.
SINGAPORE EXPATS FORUM
Singapore Expat Forum and Message Board for Expats in Singapore & Expatriates Relocating to Singapore
Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 Missing after take off
There apparently is an international register of stolen passports, which the check-in systems are connected to. A notice will pop up when somebody tries to check in with a passport recorded as stolen.
I know this because my wife got her (Singapore) passport stolen once and received a new one with the same passport number (this was when passport numbers were still identical with NRIC numbers and remained the same lifelong) - she got questioned every time she took a flight.
There must have been mischief involved in getting those two on board!
I know this because my wife got her (Singapore) passport stolen once and received a new one with the same passport number (this was when passport numbers were still identical with NRIC numbers and remained the same lifelong) - she got questioned every time she took a flight.
There must have been mischief involved in getting those two on board!
The aircraft fuel does not vaporise that easily but I agree with your earlier post. It very much looks like an explosion or somebody clever enough to sabotage the transmitters. If the first case, it's a matter of time and some floating debris will be found.PNGMK wrote:And that fuel vaporises and doesn't turn up as a slick.rajagainstthemachine wrote:A flight steward friend I was chatting with mentioned that pilots resort to offloading jet fuel when attempting to crash land to reduce explosion impact. With over 40 ships and aircraft from different countries on the search mission I think by the end of today we should have some answers today.
-
- Reporter
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 2:14 am
Who I wonder? And if the plane was turning around per reports, where was it going? All very strange...if it was sabotage and/or terrorism usually some freak shows are happy to take credit. And if it was could it be related to China's problems of late or have SE Asia' various groups, quiet for several years now, appeared again. Troubling either way.
Or were they just a couple of drug runners who picked the wrong plane.
Or were they just a couple of drug runners who picked the wrong plane.
movingtospore wrote:Who I wonder? And if the plane was turning around per reports, where was it going? All very strange...if it was sabotage and/or terrorism usually some freak shows are happy to take credit. And if it was could it be related to China's problems of late or have SE Asia' various groups, quiet for several years now, appeared again. Troubling either way.
Or were they just a couple of drug runners who picked the wrong plane.
If it were terrorists trying to kill 190 odd PRC's we'd have heard by now a claim. I'm wondering whether it was a hijacking gone wrong (i.e. they were trying to get somewhere else and in fact may have succeeded?).
Aussie news is reporting the FBI and RAAF are now involved.
-
- Reporter
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 2:51 pm
Indians have good reason to mistrust Airbuses - they probably wrote the s/w!- I believe it was over India that the control software in an airbus decided to pitch down to a yoke up input and caused the plane to crash. I can't find the link tho.ecureilx wrote:you mean 320 pilots are suicidal fly death traps?Wd40 wrote:Our trip to Sydney was also on 777 both ways on FlyScoot. But I would trust this flight more than the A320s that I have been flying using Tiger and Jetstar for short hauls in the region.
seriously?
can you qualify your statement?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_ ... 320_family
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas_Flight_72
The QF72 flight is the definitive proof of a s/w error in the airbus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_ ... 320_familyecureilx wrote:you mean 320 pilots are suicidal fly death traps?Wd40 wrote:Our trip to Sydney was also on 777 both ways on FlyScoot. But I would trust this flight more than the A320s that I have been flying using Tiger and Jetstar for short hauls in the region.
seriously?
can you qualify your statement?
It was relatively speaking, I would prefer 777.
I find your comments towards Malaysia and Indians insensitive, ignorant and racist. You should be ashamed of yourself as an experienced poster on this board.PNGMK wrote:Indians have good reason to mistrust Airbuses - they probably wrote the s/w!- I believe it was over India that the control software in an airbus decided to pitch down to a yoke up input and caused the plane to crash. I can't find the link tho.ecureilx wrote:you mean 320 pilots are suicidal fly death traps?Wd40 wrote:Our trip to Sydney was also on 777 both ways on FlyScoot. But I would trust this flight more than the A320s that I have been flying using Tiger and Jetstar for short hauls in the region.
seriously?
can you qualify your statement?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_296
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_ ... 320_family
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qantas_Flight_72
The QF72 flight is the definitive proof of a s/w error in the airbus.
- Strong Eagle
- Moderator
- Posts: 11504
- Joined: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:13 am
- Location: Off The Red Dot
- Contact:
^^^^^^^^^^^^
+1. Not exactly a Christian point of view.
The reality of the situation is that all later planes contain contain various hardware/software devices to try and control the plane in the event of pilot error.
There is much extended discussion as to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing or whether there are failure points in these mechanisms or the pilot's reactions to them... if you want to see the debates from the people that actually fly these planes, try http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/. To blame it on Indian software is to be a racist twit.
As for passport checking, Interpol itself says, "...only a handful of countries worldwide are taking care to make sure that persons possessing stolen passports are not boarding international flights.”
+1. Not exactly a Christian point of view.
The reality of the situation is that all later planes contain contain various hardware/software devices to try and control the plane in the event of pilot error.
There is much extended discussion as to whether this is a good thing or a bad thing or whether there are failure points in these mechanisms or the pilot's reactions to them... if you want to see the debates from the people that actually fly these planes, try http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/. To blame it on Indian software is to be a racist twit.
As for passport checking, Interpol itself says, "...only a handful of countries worldwide are taking care to make sure that persons possessing stolen passports are not boarding international flights.”
- rajagainstthemachine
- Manager
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:45 am
- Location: Singapore
- rajagainstthemachine
- Manager
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:45 am
- Location: Singapore
So you are saying once you discover the plane is a Boeing you'd eitherWd40 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accidents_ ... 320_familyecureilx wrote:you mean 320 pilots are suicidal fly death traps?Wd40 wrote:Our trip to Sydney was also on 777 both ways on FlyScoot. But I would trust this flight more than the A320s that I have been flying using Tiger and Jetstar for short hauls in the region.
seriously?
can you qualify your statement?
It was relatively speaking, I would prefer 777.
a.) cancel the ticket
or
b.) step off the plane and demand that the airline change its plane to a Boeing?
btw none of this would have really mattered to you until this specific incident took place. The Boeing 777 is known to have one of the safest track record so far with just 1 known crash.
To get there early is on time and showing up on time is late
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Flight cancelled; have to take more expensive flight. Who pays?
by martincymru » Mon, 23 Mar 2020 1:55 pm » in Travel & Holidays - 5 Replies
- 3497 Views
-
Last post by Lisafuller
Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:44 pm
-
-
-
Does your flight departing from Changi Airport SG require a Covid pre flight test?
by Jgrif96229 » Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:49 pm » in Travel & Holidays - 0 Replies
- 1881 Views
-
Last post by Jgrif96229
Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:49 pm
-
-
-
Emirates airlines pre flight Covid 19 testing Singspore
by Jgrif96229 » Wed, 02 Sep 2020 9:35 pm » in Travel & Holidays - 2 Replies
- 1838 Views
-
Last post by Jgrif96229
Sun, 27 Sep 2020 10:42 pm
-
-
-
Going to take a bank loan for one executive condo, about 750k, remaining 250k can take outside loan or ?
by tantan999 » Sun, 20 Mar 2022 11:43 pm » in Credit Card & Banking in Singapore - 4 Replies
- 2876 Views
-
Last post by KateshiBlack
Tue, 27 Sep 2022 1:22 am
-
-
-
Extend STVP after pass cancellation due to Covid-19 flight cancellations.
by jaychen » Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:12 pm » in PR, Citizenship, Passes & Visas for Foreigners - 22 Replies
- 18759 Views
-
Last post by Mgx
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 3:10 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests