x9200 wrote:I don't think we are too representative of all FT but generally just purely on statistical ground if someone is not fair and the tenant feels he is unfairly treated bad things are more likely to happen. Or not?
You reap what you sow; and as a landlord it
pays to have a good working relationship with a tenant.
You can see this when you have a new tenant move in, who has previously had a bad landlord. They tend to be ... very untrusting and over-assertive, a kind of presumption that unless an issue is on the brink of war, then nothing will happen about it. Not many people have sympathy for landlords, but that kind of tenancy is really unpleasant to have to deal with. ...But given a few months, things almost always settle down.
An exception comes to mind. One tenancy of two young career ladies co-sharing. Aussies I think. Barely a week passed by without some issue being raised, and it would always be done in a most hostile fashion. Like, barking angry e-mails demanding I change blown lightbulbs, when the matter is a tenant's responsibility. This then morphing into allegations that the apartments wiring was faulty throughout [i.e. so paying for £5 of bulbs in their mind was hence
my liability, completely ignoring that halogen bulbs do blow now and again, and when you have say 24 of them in one ceiling, yes, it is a matter you will have to attend to sooner or later... and so on and so on... [sigh].
I knew that flat inside out (I was onsite during it's complete renovation) so I knew what damages were reasonable or likely to be accidental. For example if you have personally fitted window blinds, used them daily for some years, let your flat and within three months the tenant reports all the blinds have fallen down 'as they were not properly fitted', then you can't help but conclude where the issue lies. That tenancy was like that throughout, and as expected the deductions required from their deposit (including the stuff they tried to hide) threatened to trigger world war 3. They threatened me with legal action, so I sent them -
- A revised list of deductions, including all the 'minor repairs/replacements etc' that I could deduct, but previously hadn't. [IME it's better to stick to any major issues for the deductions. If you take it to the level of every single cent it's more likely to trigger dispute. Better to focus on bigger matters, that in any case the tenant
knows are an issue, and hopefully give them a sense they're getting away with all/any smaller matters.]
- The weblinks to a legal advice website for tenants.
- Plus another for the Small Claims Court.
... I don't recall hearing further from them.
-------------------
A suggestion to any tenants that might benefit from it.
Do or arrange to have done whatever repairs you can yourself. For example: If the lightbulb in the fridge blows, the bulb is simple to replace and might cost S$5-10. If the landlord has to do it, odds on he'll call an electrician. In London the baseline for that simple job would be about (£100) S$200. If the electrician had to visit (and park), inspect the fridge, determine bulb type, visit an electrical shop (park), and return (and park again) to replace the bulb it might be say S$300. And all of that can quite reasonably be deducted from a lazy tenant's deposit.
-----
Tn. You've deducted S$300 to replace the fridge bulb, I checked, they cost $8!
Ll. It was your responsibility to replace it.
Tn. Give me my money back or I'm taking you to court!!
Ll. I live in Asia, what do you think, that I'm going to fly over especially to replace it for you? Since you overlooked doing it, someone else had to, and that someone cost you money.
Tn. Er!!!.... oh... ...
-----
I have had exchanges like the above before. Not quite as sarcastic from my side, but you get the idea.