For some reason the Senior Tan's name not obvioussundaymorningstaple wrote:You beat me to it MS! I saw this earlier today but was in a first aid & AED course this afternoon and only now got out. Fair warning to those who come on here thinking you'll be able to skate around it somehow.
Because he's a super heavy weight lawyer ????sundaymorningstaple wrote:Frankly, the Snr Tan's name is immaterial. That's probably why.
Her blog's title " Why didn’t ST name the NS defaulter’s father" makes some interesting reading .. .sundaymorningstaple wrote:Still doesn't matter. The son's gonna pay regardless of who his father is. In fact, he might have it worse as the government will want to ensure there is no whiff of "White Horse" Syndrome.
She displays an astounding ignorance of the rules around renunciation of SC and the procedure for avoiding an NS obligation.ecureilx wrote:Her blog's title " Why didn’t ST name the NS defaulter’s father" makes some interesting reading .. .sundaymorningstaple wrote:Still doesn't matter. The son's gonna pay regardless of who his father is. In fact, he might have it worse as the government will want to ensure there is no whiff of "White Horse" Syndrome.
I am a bit amused there .....
Father is a moron to allow or encourage an appeal. Let's place bets on whether the original sentence will be doubled or tripled on appeal!taxico wrote:FWIW:
the elder son has been sentenced to 16 weeks in the slammer (after a 4 week reduction due to good service/conduct) for evading NS for 10 years. he's appealing it, of course. and he's still serving NS...
MINDEF have pressed for mandatory prison time for defaulters that have been away for >2 years.
next up, son #2...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests