don't pop veins when dealing with singaporeans out for a bargain.crhawks wrote:I also just really realized that perhaps I couldn't exercise the DC until after the thirty days (and I lose my EP). Oh well, another chunk of capital lost. Health requirements trump cash! I did provide the LL 2 months of security deposit, so that will cover part of it - if I don't need to pay 9 additional months!
I'm not shipping anything back really, so recommendations of how to sell (mostly give away) 3-4K sgd worth of pretty new mostly IKEA furniture would help too (I know Craigs list already).
Early termination of StarHub and an M! phone contract will just be more cash, sigh. Anything else I am missing in my rush here?
It is valid to rent (have a TA), it's not valid to occupy by such tenant. Besides, this doesn't void the TA.The Ref wrote:I would ask the LL the legality of having a tenant who is not legally allowed to rent the condo. If they are found to be renting it to someone without a valid pass they may be in a world of hurt. Its worth looking into (and a mild threat to get to a mutual agreement) IANAL
I guess The ref meant to use that angle to negotiate a better deal ....x9200 wrote:It is valid to rent (have a TA), it's not valid to occupy by such tenant. Besides, this doesn't void the TA.The Ref wrote:I would ask the LL the legality of having a tenant who is not legally allowed to rent the condo. If they are found to be renting it to someone without a valid pass they may be in a world of hurt. Its worth looking into (and a mild threat to get to a mutual agreement) IANAL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests