URA has started cracking down on AirBnB.maneo wrote:People are finding accommodations in SG via AirBNB.
You could also check Hotels.com, which has a friendly enough interface with filters for daily rent & location.
That must be me! I stand corrected. Nevertheless, regardless of statutes, and assuming the OP doesn't get ripped off by the many false advertisements, temporary rooms are readily available.sundaymorningstaple wrote:People are too lazy to use the search engine here.
Interesting phrasing above. IME in the drafting of regulations, bye-laws etc there is a very clear distinction between 'should' and 'must'. The former being 'best practice', and breach of the latter effectively being 'breaking the law'.therat wrote:Quote from URA:
Private residential properties or the rooms within their premises should [edit]...
Owners of private residential properties should similarly comply with the URA's guidelines [edit]...
Now you know why some landlords are so scared of losing their property, they insist on "NO VISITORS STAYING OVER" Rule ?maneo wrote:If someone provides their place on only an occasional basis, they can get away with saying that they are merely letting their "friends" stay in their place.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests