Asked friends in SG they think it might be Tagalog. Don't see it myself! It is not a language I think I have ever heard before.Eau2011 wrote:Funny. what kind of language is it?nakatago wrote:A call to arms?
The man should be Gerard Butler.
Asked friends in SG they think it might be Tagalog. Don't see it myself! It is not a language I think I have ever heard before.Eau2011 wrote:Funny. what kind of language is it?nakatago wrote:A call to arms?
The man should be Gerard Butler.
Voluntary. Breedmon was banned.JR8 wrote:Enforced or voluntary lol?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Two of the "acts" are on intermission.
Let's guess the 3rd one. Auntie Changster, Manchild and ... Breedmum?
No, just a fat wally springs to mind. No offence, there, just so you know how it stings, What's this, trying to push through your business cards in this China syndrome? Are you in sarong and songkok yourself?JR8 wrote:Enforced or voluntary lol?sundaymorningstaple wrote:Two of the "acts" are on intermission.
Let's guess the 3rd one. Auntie Changster, Manchild and ... Breedmum?
Indeed, I'd like to know more of MANTHINK. He's obviously a , what's the genealogical term, a pre homosapien, i.e. a CroMagnon, the tribe that left Afrika and settled in Mongolia, Siberia dn China before the HomoSapians and Homo Erectus who migrated to the ME and Europe, and who'd inhabited the Nusantara long before anyone else. A Lemurian like me, perhaps. I believe he's certainly up to it. But who knows, women might jolly well be morally superior.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Two of the "acts" are on intermission.
I don't know why it is inflammatory but it does point out that China's foreign policy turns a blind eye to terrorists, despots, and dictators, and essentially screws the countries in which it agrees to provide investment. Just look at some of the 'deals' made in Africa... cheap roads agreed to by some corrupt dictator, while China walks away with the lion's share of the resources.tyianchang wrote:...and the latest update is about how China's beating the US in signing up contracts for access to a wide range of commodities globally, due to its 'no strings attached' policy. Another inflammatory issue no doubt.
I can assure you 'pride' was absent by any implication. As I said, power corrputs and I'd hate to see one arrogant Chinese as a result of her economic surge ahead today. I can say that as I'm a Chinese why stays behid, I guess. lolStrong Eagle wrote:I don't know why it is inflammatory but it does point out that China's foreign policy turns a blind eye to terrorists, despots, and dictators, and essentially screws the countries in which it agrees to provide investment. Just look at some of the 'deals' made in Africa... cheap roads agreed to by some corrupt dictator, while China walks away with the lion's share of the resources.tyianchang wrote:...and the latest update is about how China's beating the US in signing up contracts for access to a wide range of commodities globally, due to its 'no strings attached' policy. Another inflammatory issue no doubt.
I was aware China had started building roads, railways in some African countries way back in the 60s before the so called dictators were identified. From the latest documentary done by the BBC in Africa, China does benefit the poor with the provision of transport means for many to buy, sell nad trade from state to state.
Or take a look at Laos... deforestation on a grand scale, even though the forests are protected... the Chinese bribe corrupt Lao officials. And so many Han Chinese are coming to Lao to do the work that there is real concern amongst the aid agencies that within decades that native Lao people will become a minority, and Laos just one more Chinese province... just like they are doing with the Uighurs and in Tibet... destroy the local races by loading the places up with Chinese.
That's why I support the One child policy. But from the argument it stirred, China can't win either way.
It's up to the Laotians to decide if they want Chinese assimilation. The UN recognised Tibet as part of China. The Uighurs have a historical link with China way back from the 17th century , if not before as Xinjiang and Tibet used China as administrators. Today, they are autonomous regions of China. From what I hear, there're mixed receptions within these countries, some supporting the developments and ending of local strifes from within. But it's untrue that the Chinese 'destoy the local races' though it might be true that many Chinese have moved into these areas. The way I see it is that emigrations have always been the practice for all races and countries - as Europeans, migrated to the USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, Africa and Asia.
It was while looking for the fabulous 'Cathay' that the Portuguese and Spaniards discovered America. Today, the indigenous Americans are in reservations - I don't think the Uighers and Tibetans are in resevations but are free to move about and there was a history of the underclasses involved. Beside, Xinjiang is a diverse region with Kazaks, Mongolians, Han Chinese and Russians too.
No, there is nothing to be proud of, beating the US in contracts. Just one more example of China failing to live up to its responsibilities as a world power.
Not forgetting the arms sales to African nations that support terrorism, in which I believe a Student from the UK is doing a PHd on the subject!Strong Eagle wrote:I don't know why it is inflammatory but it does point out that China's foreign policy turns a blind eye to terrorists, despots, and dictators, and essentially screws the countries in which it agrees to provide investment. Just look at some of the 'deals' made in Africa... cheap roads agreed to by some corrupt dictator, while China walks away with the lion's share of the resources.tyianchang wrote:...and the latest update is about how China's beating the US in signing up contracts for access to a wide range of commodities globally, due to its 'no strings attached' policy. Another inflammatory issue no doubt.
Or take a look at Laos... deforestation on a grand scale, even though the forests are protected... the Chinese bribe corrupt Lao officials. And so many Han Chinese are coming to Lao to do the work that there is real concern amongst the aid agencies that within decades that native Lao people will become a minority, and Laos just one more Chinese province... just like they are doing with the Uighurs and in Tibet... destroy the local races by loading the places up with Chinese.
No, there is nothing to be proud of, beating the US in contracts. Just one more example of China failing to live up to its responsibilities as a world power.
The point, which you seem to have missed, is to not be an apologist by pointing out the missteps of other countries (and the US has plenty to answer for) but to note, that the second largest economy in the world, soon to become the largest, still refuses to act as an international partner, and instead cares little of the consequences of its actions so long as China profits. Works in the short term... in the long term the Chinese will f*ck everybody, including themselves.tyianchang wrote:I don't think pride was implied. To me, it's just a fact I gleaned from the Financial Times, as posted. I think China sees its responsibilities as a member of the UN Secuity Council with the full rights of a free country, able to make her own decisions.Strong Eagle wrote:I don't know why it is inflammatory but it does point out that China's foreign policy turns a blind eye to terrorists, despots, and dictators, and essentially screws the countries in which it agrees to provide investment. Just look at some of the 'deals' made in Africa... cheap roads agreed to by some corrupt dictator, while China walks away with the lion's share of the resources.tyianchang wrote:...and the latest update is about how China's beating the US in signing up contracts for access to a wide range of commodities globally, due to its 'no strings attached' policy. Another inflammatory issue no doubt.
I was aware China had started building roads, railways in some African countries way back in the 60s before the so called dictators were identified. From the latest documentary done by the BBC in Africa, China does benefit the poor with the provision of transport means for many to buy, sell nad trade from state to state.
Or take a look at Laos... deforestation on a grand scale, even though the forests are protected... the Chinese bribe corrupt Lao officials. And so many Han Chinese are coming to Lao to do the work that there is real concern amongst the aid agencies that within decades that native Lao people will become a minority, and Laos just one more Chinese province... just like they are doing with the Uighurs and in Tibet... destroy the local races by loading the places up with Chinese.
That's why I support the One child policy. But from the argument it stirred, China can't win either way.
It's up to the Laotians to decide if they want Chinese assimilation. The UN recognised Tibet as part of China. The Uighurs have a historical link with China way back from the 17th century , if not before as Xinjiang and Tibet used China as administrators. Today, they are autonomous regions of China. From what I hear, there're mixed receptions within these countries, some supporting the developments and ending of local strifes from within. But it's untrue that the Chinese 'destoy the local races' though it might be true that many Chinese have moved into these areas. The way I see it is that emigrations have always been the practice for all races and countries - as Europeans, migrated to the USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, Africa and Asia.
It was while looking for the fabulous 'Cathay' that the Portuguese and Spaniards discovered America. Today, the indigenous Americans are in reservations - I don't think the Uighers and Tibetans are in resevations but are free to move about and there was a history of the underclasses involved. Beside, Xinjiang is a diverse region with Kazaks, Mongolians, Han Chinese and Russians too.
No, there is nothing to be proud of, beating the US in contracts. Just one more example of China failing to live up to its responsibilities as a world power.
The point for argument from what you have raised, is to take Brazil as an example - that the Europeans have been logging irresponsibly in Brazil before and now the Chinese are there, they could be following the same course. It's here that I would like China to start listening to the voices of the indigenous people and help them preserve their way of life. As China has done similarly to the ethnic minorties within her boundaries.
Every country should be sensitive to the voices of the natives and the minorities. It's necessary for the super powers to work collaboratively in all areas. Wars are not a solution - the current upheaval in Libya will not end the problems they have. I'd hate to see any other country having civil wars and fighting to gian control of resources.
In the present stage, there's just free trade and many people are using their political justifications to determine what's free trade.
1. Let's say the natives should know who they want to do business with.
2. The UN can work with members to draw out certain criteria for fair trade that all countries should comply with..
"China fighting off the world?" You seem to have some serious misconceptions about where China came from and where it is going to.tyianchang wrote:What goes round comes round. The world was screwed up while China was fighting off the world.
It was sad China had to catch up - better to have bicycles and felt shoes than Bentleys and trainers.
I don't need to apologise, but I'm not prepared to paint it totally black. One of the positive things is the way China's helping to stabilize the global economy. If she's too clever and does too well, that's hurray; but when there're rogue dealers and manufacturers like the poison milk scandal, then the Chinese government has to act. And it did when it went beyond a degree of doubt.
Who invented the dvd btw. Someone told me it was the Chinese? Whatever, swearing and roughing up is shxx talk and you were just beginning to gain my respect.
DVD is the work of many companies and many people. DVD evolved from CD and related technologies. Some of the early proposals for "high-density CD" were made in 1993, and these efforts gradually coalesced into two competing proposed formats. The MMCD format was backed by Sony, Philips, and others. The SD format was backed by Toshiba, Matsushita, Time Warner,
What's this - always telling me what my beliefs should be??? Seriously blinkered discussions always go round that way beginning the opening lines with accusations. Try to learn how to be impartial.Strong Eagle wrote:"China fighting off the world?" You seem to have some serious misconceptions about where China came from and where it is going to.tyianchang wrote:What goes round comes round. The world was screwed up while China was fighting off the world.
It was sad China had to catch up - better to have bicycles and felt shoes than Bentleys and trainers.
I don't need to apologise, but I'm not prepared to paint it totally black. One of the positive things is the way China's helping to stabilize the global economy. If she's too clever and does too well, that's hurray; but when there're rogue dealers and manufacturers like the poison milk scandal, then the Chinese government has to act. And it did when it went beyond a degree of doubt.
Who invented the dvd btw. Someone told me it was the Chinese? Whatever, swearing and roughing up is shxx talk and you were just beginning to gain my respect.
The Chinese today behave the way they do because they have been screwed, shafted, cheated, and killed by their leaders. If you don't get yours then you don't get anything. And the leadership reflects this attitude in its global dealings.
The Chinese have invented lots of things, created massive civilizations while Europe was in a morass and the new world yet discovered. That does not absolve them from the fact that they now spew their tainted baby formulas across the world, in a variety of programs, because they have not yet gained enough political maturity to solve the problem. For one thing, until there is an independent judiciary, the government will always be corrupt.
In closing, frankly, I don't care whether I gain your respect or not. You are not someone whose opinion of who I am matters much to me.
Hmmm... considering that I have made exactly two posts here, I find your term 'always' somewhat wanting.tyianchang wrote:What's this - always telling me what my beliefs should be???
Okay, give me time to read up.ksl wrote:One thing the Chinese didn't invent was DVD's and they invent very little today, as they lack the technological skills to do so. But they do copy and steal technology from other MNC.
In fact DVD's evolved from CD techology and these companies were mostly Japanese and American in a joint effort.
DVD is the work of many companies and many people. DVD evolved from CD and related technologies. Some of the early proposals for "high-density CD" were made in 1993, and these efforts gradually coalesced into two competing proposed formats. The MMCD format was backed by Sony, Philips, and others. The SD format was backed by Toshiba, Matsushita, Time Warner,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests