You clearly live a blinkered life.....anneteoh wrote:But FP is unheard of in the West where the individual reigns supreme, even within the family structure. With the current crisis on pensions, annuities and other financial shortfalls faced by the retireds, FP might be a jolly good idea. I mean, imagine getting such returns from your children - all of which goes without saying. A good culture to continue?
This is a very dangerous mindset from parents. I know some people who have children just because they want good returns from them in the future and not because they want children to reach their full potential. They start really early to depend on the children. These children, in turn, fail to establish lives for themselves which further prevents them from properly taking care of their parents and doom their children's futures as well.anneteoh wrote:I mean, imagine getting such returns from your children - all of which goes without saying. A good culture to continue?
Wow! RROI -(Reproductive Return on Investment?)nakatago wrote:I know some people who have children just because they want good returns from them in the future and not because they want children to reach their full potential. They start really early to depend on the children. These children, in turn, fail to establish lives for themselves which further prevents them from properly taking care of their parents and doom their children's futures as well.anneteoh wrote:I mean, imagine getting such returns from your children - all of which goes without saying. A good culture to continue?
Drat! I've just lost a few paragraphs of meaning talk.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Anne, while you were observing here, did you also take the time to go to the various old folks homes to see all those parents who have been abandoned by their children and never visited nor do the children even pay for their upkeep there after consigning them to the rubbish dump as a reward for bringing them up the best that they could? That's the other side of FP here in Singapore that no one wants to face nor admit too, but it's there for all to see.
Anyway, Hope you have a good CYN, wherever you are and however you practice it.
tyianchang wrote: But on the face of the current problems we face, like the frequenct spates of violence (most recent - bomb explosion killing 36 in Moscow ) and the financial crisis due to inflationary trends against monetary value leading to pension crisis for the elderly, I thought FP should be a good practice to reinvigorate. Youngsters imbued with the sensitive issues concerning FP should be less easily influenced by outisde ideologies and peer groups.
I think SG presents a ratio of 7:3 of FP against that of non FP? ?
As Curious George had pointed out, it's mandatory in SG - so is that a necessary legal requirement to ensure the elderly are cared for or is it an imposition on the children? As you'd said, many old folks are abandoned in SG - doesn't the govt follow their cases up with their children? Would that be considered an interference?
Hi MHB, I was prevented from replying as somehow someone had messed up my user name etc . So I had to get a different name to enter the forum and respond to the posts.Mary Hatch Bailey wrote:Damn! What happened to my post?
Well here's the gist of it:
anneteoh you are basing your premise on two gross stereotypes:
1. That a benevolent version of filial piety is practiced by 'most if not all youngsters' here in Singapore, and
2. the concept of filial piety is 'unheard of in the West'.
As I understand it, filial piety has more to do with respect and obedience and less to do with pocket money. Money means nothing without respect. I think children in Confucius's day treated their parents exactly as they do today ~ as they were taught to by their parents, regardless of geography.
Honor they mother and father is a universal concept.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests