Such is human nature, the system will be manipulated to reflect this whatever the system, capitalist, communist etc.Splatted wrote:Where I disagree,... not everyone in Singapore has an equal opportunity to excel.
It's easier to succeed in a meritocratic society when you have wealthy parents backing you in all your endeavors.
Actually he make good sense on the bungalows. If all you do is focus on them, you will eventually gain the necessary reputation that will have both seller AND buyers flocking to you without the unending hustle that is necessary for the generic real estate con-artist. Setting yourself up at a certain level, eventually will find yourself there instead of down in the trenches with the multitude of everyday con-artists. You become a specialist.teck21 wrote:It is interesting, but it is also written by Adam Khoo. A story from a real estate agent who previously attended one of his motivational talks, and his suggestion for real estate agents was that to make more money, all of them should just focus on selling good class bungalows.
And he doesn't say anything no one doesn't already know, unless they choose not to see.
I was really shocked to discover that exams are tick tests, chose the right answer from a choice of 4. WTF is that it, they can't drive either, if that's anything to go by.They all excel in their field, and I think most are better on paper then any expat I meet.
+1utopia wrote:I disagree with a number of parts in Adam Khoo's article.
Singapore embraced their education system to build the 'knowledge worker', which entails more earning capacity then a medial worker or laborer (compared to its neighbours).
With better (best?) grades, you do get into better schools and the local University.
There is 24 hours a day, so if studying becomes the primary, overriding focus, where are the the other aspects of development ?
Additionally, there are whole parts of the education system - English Lit / History for example, which requires you to regurgitate texts that have been already over-analysed for years, and not really to 'ask' questions.
Add in the natural competitiveness and 'face' of the parents of the students, and you get a society that grew up skewed/unbalanced.
With better (best?) grades/qualifications, males are rewarded in NS with rank. Application for government-linked jobs is directly tied against your paper qualifications.
During all this development processes, 'breaking the rules' is harshly dealt with. Make a mistake or transgression, and it will likely to be on your records for eternity.
Enter the expats / foreign talent, with their different view of the world, with balanced upbringing, and where risk-taking is potentially rewarded, and thinking-outside-the-box, and if they occur, mistakes are a part of learning process.
I would say it requires a calculated change in the education and upbringing process.
Apart from for the wurst-gobblers at Pravda, [can I say that? ] GDP per capita is not a useful measure of 'richness' in any shape or form.Adam Khoo: The expats will rule Singapore
...It is a quality that our grandfathers and great-grandfathers (who came from distant lands) had that turned Singapore from a fishing village to the third richest country in the world (according to GDP per capita). ...
Well, it really depends....JR8 wrote: You have to consider cost of living. For example if I live in a country where I earn $30k, but a 2 bed flat is 10 times my annual salary, am I 'richer' than living in a country earning $20k, and the same flat being 5 times my salary? Of course not.
From the original article, as quoted, 'according to GDP per capita'. <Squinting> that takes into account, the number of people in different countries.Asdracles wrote:You are checking the wrong link. If you check just the country GDP, a country with 5 million people will be always behind much more populated countries as those you wrote about.
If you check the GDP per capita PPP, Singapore is around 3/5/6 in the World according with different sources. More logical, as it counts the GDP that each person manages
I just refer to your wikipedia link:JR8 wrote: From the original article, as quoted, 'according to GDP per capita'. <Squinting> that takes into account, the number of people in different countries.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests