If only you was right, there might be a glimmer of hope, but I don't think so!ashnd76 wrote:well..the LAbour party political manifesto " Bring Rights Home" is only a tool to serve political purpose, and to appeal to younger voters.
The HRA 1998 which supposedly give fundemental rights and freedoms seriously lacks bite coz the Art. 13 : Right to effective remedy has been taken out.
In fact subsequent to these articles there are so many exceptions to it. Best of all ECHR is not even binding.
So i guess, yeah, UK still holds a tight grip on its parliamentary supremacy. Its merely political.
But i do think time is running out coz if all member states do ractify the EU constitution, thereby creating a United States of Europe, it'll be a matter of time before UK gets an ultimatum.
To follow EU totally , adpot its Constitution and convert to Euro...or withdraw itself from EU.
Only time will tell..
Yes I agree with you there, at least Maggie could think for herself, I guess Tony Blair the poodle, has been influenced by the Bushs' ranch in the USA.ashnd76 wrote:well precisely..
in fact there are some commentaries who are of the opinion that UK was much better off under Thatcher.
Notwithstanding the fact that Thatcher had her fair share of critics but she was certainly no US poodle.
I was reading about Blairs pension a few days ago, I believe it was 150,000 pounds sterling a year, payable now!!! And the talk was he can earn 300,000 pound a year holding seminars! I wouldn't mind, but he's not even a true labour politician!ashnd76 wrote:Honestly speaking, Blair made lots of promises in his political manifesto "Bring Rights Home" but ten years down e road, not all of his promises have been truly delivered.
Was surfing BBC.co.uk and it showed a picture of a man carrying a card at downing st, saying:" Good Riddance" ! (hehehe...dats was cool man!)
Well..LEt's see what Gordon Brown can come up with, but being the first PM in 17 years, to be elected unopposed, might have a certain impact, i don't know.
Anyway was reading briefly on his profile, he's a gifted guy it seems, actively distributing Labour pamplets at e age of 12 and getting into University at 16 or sumthing.
Actually the UK and development of nerve agents is not banned, only, the use of, under the Geneve convention, the scientists experimented on soldiers without their knowledge from 1952 right up until 1989, there had only been one instant death in the gas chambers in 1952. Ronald Maddison I think is name was, his remaining family won the case of unlawful killing in 2005 against the Ministry fo Defence, but over the years thousands have been poisoned, with parlimentary approval!ashnd76 wrote:sheeesh...its dat bad huh.
I guess there are countless UK citizens who are disappointed with Blair, I was reading about Lord Irvine, who was once the Lord Chancellor, and Blair's ex-room mate during their university days.
He got so pissed off by the govt's meddling in the judiciary that he resigned almost immediately.
Yes it is quite true, that The European courts can over rule British Law, if one is able to get that far, for one the British Law since 1972 has been specifically changed to obstruct, rather than stop.ashnd76 wrote:With rgds to EU law, you mentioned that the UK does not recognize European Law? But i do beg to differ, coz when Westminster passed the 1972 legislation: European Communities Act, the Parliament concede their supremacy to the EU.
There have been numerous cases whereby the ECJ has issued judgements against the UK for breaching EU treaties, regulations and directives. From commercial cases to admiralty to employment, the whole spectrum.
In fact the EU law is so powerful that it has direct vertical & horizontal effect, meaning aggrieved claimants like yourself can comence an action against a UK public authority or against another private individual.
If the UK local courts cant handle it, you can take up your case all the way to ECJ
And if an Act of Parliament is in breach, EU law will dictate that it be put aside and repeal, especially when it involves employment law and personal injury is sustained.
But of coz, time and financial means is a concern for most but you might want to explore this avenue of using the ECA 1972 Act. From the brief facts which you told me, i honestly think you have a solid case man..
I wish! Once all appeals are exhausted, I could then approach the Ombudsman, although there would be no real benefit, other than he would say I am right, and they would correct the fault, I doubt very much that they would consider the 3 years of pain and suffering, and try to put the blame on computer error.Juz an idea... any chance of referring your case to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. I heard it has been steadily increasing its bite in bringing some govt. depts to task.
Seems the US is also in deep financial trouble, with national debt that they cannot pay off, lenders becoming more cautious about lending more, and not enough to bankroll the baby-boomers soon to retire. It's not going to be pretty.GordonGekko wrote:All I can say is that the EU is the final nail in the coffin of Europe. EU and its members cannot win the globalization game AND keep on upholding the state-provided life most its citizens lead today.
The future is in Asia.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests