Somehow this rings false. If I have a network and you do not then what information will you be able to give me as in "exchange information" as it would appear you do not have any information to exchange. Would appear a bit one-sided don't you think?David91 wrote: PM me if you have a relevant network and we can exchange information.
David
Yes your right SMS! This guy is just after some freelancers to help kick start his website, probably without pay, but with incentives in the company if successful. He doesn't have much to exchange at all, at this stage.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Somehow this rings false. If I have a network and you do not then what information will you be able to give me as in "exchange information" as it would appear you do not have any information to exchange. Would appear a bit one-sided don't you think?David91 wrote: PM me if you have a relevant network and we can exchange information.
David
Are you not looking for people in the respective services offered? You can't blame SMS for suspecting, that this is more of an adverisement, than a discussion of services on your website.allowing more time for exploration and discussion of the services that will be on offer
First of all David, just to spar with you, to give you something to think about, I was freelancing for a Taiwanese digital camera manufacturer several years ago, he requested my help in branding his product, at the time I knew nothing of online marketing.should recognise the likelihood of suppliers of product to the site making more money than they would otherwise have done—a fact they
From what I can read, the first major flaw I can see is one that will possibly doom your venture before you get it off the ground. The term you used, I believe, was "Social Responsibility" which is kinda like "military intelligence" definitely an oxymoron in Asia in general. That's is why intellectual property is pirated so much here. Just food for thought.David91 wrote:To help everyone make sense of the whole, I have grounded all the potentially disparate aspects in a unifying theme of social responsibility which I believe will have some resonance in the relevant target communities of suppliers and users. In asserting this as a simple fact, I know I may sound not a little naive. So to avoid any doubt in the minds of those who read this, I frankly admit that the project is a form of social/commercial experiment and that its implementation, even if only partially successful, would be considered threatening to some existing business interests.
No david, I think you have misunderstood, we are not talking plagiarisms, piracy or anti government feelings, we are talking about the right to voice opinions and discuss in free speech, with respect to all. We are not robots.David91 wrote:"Social responsibility" means different things to different people. Here in Singapore, the Straits Settlement Co-operative Societies Ordinance came into force on the 1st January 1925, and its legacy is seen in the values daily demonstrated through the NTUC's businesses which would be considered integral to local life on the island. More generally, I see little causal connection between the extent to which one group of people may indulge in copyright piracy, and the question of whether a business should apply principles of corporate social responsibility to its processes and operations. Your implication that a business can only hope to be a success if it is unethical and, possibly, corrupt is a sad reflection on our times.
Maybe a sad reflection on our times but do you read the Dire Straits? have/are you follow/following the NKF saga? Ethics and corruption are part and parcel to almost all large organizations the truth be known. The larger an organization the more ways to hide it. China Aviation and the recycling company in recent times comes to mind. No country is safe from unscrupulous businesses or persons within those businesses.David91 wrote:"Social responsibility" means different things to different people. Here in Singapore, the Straits Settlement Co-operative Societies Ordinance came into force on the 1st January 1925, and its legacy is seen in the values daily demonstrated through the NTUC's businesses which would be considered integral to local life on the island. More generally, I see little causal connection between the extent to which one group of people may indulge in copyright piracy, and the question of whether a business should apply principles of corporate social responsibility to its processes and operations. Your implication that a business can only hope to be a success if it is unethical and, possibly, corrupt is a sad reflection on our times.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests