Singapore Expats Forum

We have to stop talking about 377A

A moderated forum for serious discussions only.
Posts: 1582
Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 9:45 pm

We have to stop talking about 377A

Post by offshoreoildude » Wed, 23 Jan 2013 8:57 am

The AGC warned that while the appeal is on they will consider Contempt charges against people discussing 377A publicly. ... 78/1/.html


Meanwhile, the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has urged against public discussion on this matter.

This is because the statements made by members of the public risk sub judice contempt.

AGC said in a statement released on Tuesday night there would be a real risk of prejudice if the statements are calculated to affect the minds of the courts hearing the case, parties concerned in the case, or if they amount to public pre-judgement of the case.

It added it takes a serious view of any statements which are sub judice and will, if necessary, act to protect the integrity of the administration of justice.
Now I'm called PNGMK

User avatar
Posts: 36178
Joined: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Retired on the Little Red Dot

Post by sundaymorningstaple » Wed, 23 Jan 2013 9:27 am

Yeah, saw that this morning. Therefore I believe it ends here for the time being.



  • Similar Topics
    Last post

Return to “Strictly Speaking”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest